| Name |
Privilege Abuse |
|
| Likelyhood of attack |
Typical severity |
| High |
Medium |
|
| Summary |
An adversary is able to exploit features of the target that should be reserved for privileged users or administrators but are exposed to use by lower or non-privileged accounts. Access to sensitive information and functionality must be controlled to ensure that only authorized users are able to access these resources. |
| Prerequisites |
The target must have misconfigured their access control mechanisms such that sensitive information, which should only be accessible to more trusted users, remains accessible to less trusted users. The adversary must have access to the target, albeit with an account that is less privileged than would be appropriate for the targeted resources. |
| Solutions | Configure account privileges such privileged/administrator functionality is not exposed to non-privileged/lower accounts. |
| Related Weaknesses |
|
CWE ID
|
Description
|
| CWE-269 |
Improper Privilege Management |
| CWE-732 |
Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource |
| CWE-1317 |
Missing Security Checks in Fabric Bridge |
|
| Related CAPECS |
|
CAPEC ID
|
Description
|
| CAPEC-664 |
An adversary exploits improper input validation by submitting maliciously crafted input to a target application running on a server, with the goal of forcing the server to make a request either to itself, to web services running in the server’s internal network, or to external third parties. If successful, the adversary’s request will be made with the server’s privilege level, bypassing its authentication controls. This ultimately allows the adversary to access sensitive data, execute commands on the server’s network, and make external requests with the stolen identity of the server. Server Side Request Forgery attacks differ from Cross Site Request Forgery attacks in that they target the server itself, whereas CSRF attacks exploit an insecure user authentication mechanism to perform unauthorized actions on the user's behalf. |
|